BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

  • Engineer (Facilities) (Non-Represented)

  • BART
  • Oakland, California United States View Map
Marketing Statement

Ride BART to a satisfying career that lets you both: 1) make a difference to Bay Area residents, and 2) enjoy excellent pay, benefits, and employment stability. BART is looking for people who like to be challenged, work in a fast-paced environment, and have a passion for connecting riders to work, school and other places they need to go. BART offers a competitive salary, comprehensive health benefits, paid time off, and the CalPERS retirement program.

Job Summary

Pay Rate
Pay Band E06 (Non-Represented)
$131,259.00 /annually (minimum) - $ 198,858.00 /annually (maximum)
Note: The negotiable salary offer will be between $131,259.00 - $147,069.00 annually, commensurate with education and experience.

Reports To
Senior Manager of Engineering Programs or designee

Current Assignment
This announcement will be used to establish a pool of eligible candidates for Engineer vacancies that may occur within the next six (6) months within the Facilities Division of BART's Office of Infrastructure Delivery.

BART is one of the most iconic and essential transit systems in the United States, serving tens of thousands of riders across the San Francisco Bay Area each day. The BART Engineer position is a unique opportunity to join a dynamic, mission-driven organization where your engineering expertise directly supports the safe and reliable movement of people across the Bay Area. Engineers in the Facilities Division work at the intersection of capital project delivery, preventative maintenance, and construction maintenance, making every day both challenging and rewarding.

We are seeking talented engineers with backgrounds in preventative maintenance and construction maintenance. Engineers in this pool will support the planning, design, and delivery of projects related to the development and modification of BART's facility infrastructure and systems. While all engineering disciplines are welcomed, candidates with education and experience in the maintenance branch of engineering are strongly preferred.

Successful candidates will bring a blend of field and office experience, thrive in a collaborative multidisciplinary environment, and demonstrate the versatility to work across project delivery and maintenance functions. Please note, off-shift and weekend availability is required when operational needs demand it.

As an Engineer in the Facilities Division, your work will span the full lifecycle of infrastructure projects and maintenance programs, including but not limited to:
  • Supporting the planning, design, and construction of improvements to BART's facilities infrastructure and facility systems
  • Developing drawings, specifications, and engineering estimates for construction contracts on well-defined, smaller-scale projects with a high degree of independence
  • Applying preventative and corrective maintenance engineering principles to a diverse inventory of BART equipment and systems
  • Contributing to project controls activities, including the development and monitoring of schedules, risk registers, earned value tracking, and cost projections
  • Serving as a technical resource for field and construction crews, troubleshooting complex issues in real-time, including during off-hours when critical systems require immediate attention
  • Collaborating with multidisciplinary project teams composed of engineers, planners, contractors, and operations staff
  • Engaging with BART leadership, management, and external stakeholders through clear, concise technical communication

The most qualified candidates for this position will have highly developed competencies in the following areas, which will be reinforced with related work experience and will be clearly articulated during the selection process:
  • Engineering Skills (Field and Office): Demonstrated ability to perform engineering work effectively in both office and field environments, adapting seamlessly between design tasks and hands-on site engagement
  • Engineering Principles and Emerging Technology: A solid foundational understanding of engineering principles paired with a genuine curiosity and commitment to staying current with emerging technologies, industry developments, and evolving best practices
  • Equipment Maintenance Approaches: Familiarity with a variety of maintenance methodologies, including preventative, predictive, and corrective maintenance, and the ability to determine and apply the most appropriate approach to diverse equipment and systems
  • Independent Project Work: Proven ability to work independently on smaller, well-defined projects, including the development of drawings, specifications, and engineering estimates for construction contracts with minimal oversight
  • Problem-Solving Ability: Excellent analytical and creative problem-solving skills, with a demonstrated track record of identifying root causes and implementing effective, lasting solutions in complex engineering environments
  • Project Controls Proficiency: Working knowledge of project control tools, including scheduling software, risk registers, earned value management, and cost projection methodologies
  • Communication Skills: Excellent written and verbal communication abilities, including the capacity to deliver clear presentations, author concise and accurate technical reports, and translate complex or highly technical issues for non-technical BART management and leadership audiences
  • Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Demonstrated experience working effectively within multidisciplinary teams, including the ability to coordinate across engineering, operations, construction, and administrative functions
  • Schedule Flexibility: Willingness and availability to maintain a flexible work schedule, including off-shift hours and weekends, to meet the demands of challenging project or technical issues and time-sensitive maintenance-related needs

Application & Selection Process
All applicants must apply online at www.bart.gov/jobs . Applications must be completed in full and include all requested information, including dates of employment, positions held, hours worked, and a detailed description of duties performed.

Applicants may attach a resume to provide supplemental information; however, the resume does not substitute for completing the application form in its entirety. Only information included in the application at the time of submission will be used to determine whether applicants meet the minimum qualifications for the position. All application materials must be submitted by the closing date and time listed on the job announcement. Applications received after the closing deadline will not be considered.

Applicants who require assistance with the online application process may contact the Talent Acquisition Division at (510) 464-6112 or employment@bart.gov .

The selection process for this position may include one or more of the following: a skills or performance demonstration, written examination, and/or panel or individual interview.

All applications will be reviewed by the Talent Acquisition Division to determine whether applicants meet the established Minimum Qualifications (MQs). Applicants who meet the MQs may be referred to the hiring department for further evaluation as part of the selection process.

The selected candidate must demonstrate a work history reflecting reliability and dependability and may be required to provide copies of certificates, diplomas, or other documentation required by law, including proof of authorization to work in the United States.

Pre-employment processing will include a background check. This requirement does not apply to current full-time District employees unless the position requires additional evaluations or clearances.

Examples of Duties

Performs a variety of professional engineering duties related to the subject department. Duties may include preparing engineering specifications, preliminary cost estimates, engineering drawings, sketches, calculations and analyses.

Prepares engineering designs, specifications, costs and quantity estimates for engineering construction projects; prepares and/or reviews the adequacy and accuracy of computations.

Assists in the establishment of schedules and methods for providing engineering project oversight services; responsible for the verification of quantities of materials and adherence to specifications; may recommend resources to be allocated.

Monitors work activities to ensure compliance with established policies and procedures; evaluates proposed changes to approved plans and specifications.

Recommends approval of and submits contractor’s progress payment applications; performs audits of contractor and suppliers to ensure adherence to established policies procedures.

Prepares a variety of reports and correspondence on project matters including Inspector’s Daily Reports, monthly and final completion reports, contract modifications negotiations, field and design engineering changes, and correspondence with the contractor on fulfillment of requirements.

Discusses and coordinates engineering design or construction project activities with design engineering staff and other affected engineering personnel.

Maintains awareness of progress on assigned engineering design or construction projects to ensure compliance with designated time and cost schedules.

Provides assistance to inspectors in the interpretation of plans and resolution of problems during construction.

Reviews construction design plans to evaluate potential construction problems; monitors construction project expenditures.

Utilizes a variety of engineering programs and application including CADD.

Attends and participates in professional group meetings; stays abreast of new trends and innovations in the field of engineering design and construction.

Conducts field inspections; ensures compliance with specifications.

Minimum Qualifications

Education

Bachelor’s degree in engineering or a related field from an accredited college or university.

Experience

Two (2) years of (full-time equivalent) verifiable engineering design and construction project experience.

Substitution

Additional engineering experience as outlined above may be substituted for the above education on a year-for-year basis. A college degree is preferred.

Knowledge and Skills

Knowledge of:
  • Principles and practices of engineering in assigned discipline area
  • Operations, services and activities of an engineering design and construction program
  • Principles and practices of engineering cost estimating
  • Methods and techniques of field measuring and testing
  • Engineering contract administration principles and practices
  • Materials and equipment methods utilized in engineering
  • Terminology, methods, practices, and techniques used in related engineering report preparation
  • Advanced mathematical principles
  • Current office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers
  • Specialized computer programs or systems utilized in construction engineering design including CADD
  • Related building codes, regulations and provisions
  • Related Federal, State, and local laws, codes and regulations


Skill/Ability in :
  • Applying principles and practices in engineering design and construction in assigned projects
  • Interpreting and explaining District policies and procedures
  • Preparing clear and concise reports
  • Interpreting and preparing revisions to engineering plans, drawings, and specifications
  • Communicating clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing
  • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work


Equal Employment Opportunity GroupBox1

The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is an equal opportunity employer. Applicants shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), religion, national origin (including language use restrictions), disability (mental and physical, including HIV and AIDS), ancestry, marital status, military status, veteran status, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics and information), or any protected category prohibited by local, state or federal laws.

The BART Human Resources Department will make reasonable efforts in the examination process to accommodate persons with disabilities or for religious reasons. Please advise the Human Resources Department of any special needs in advance of the examination by emailing at least 5 days before your examination date at employment@bart.gov .

Qualified veterans may be eligible to obtain additional veteran's credit in the selection process for this recruitment (effective Jan. 1, 2013). To obtain the credit, veterans must attach to the application a DD214 discharge document or proof of disability and complete/submit the Veteran's Preference Application no later than the closing date of the posting. For more information about this credit please go to the Veteran's Preference Policy and Application link at www.bart.gov/jobs .

The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) prides itself in offering best in class benefits packages to employees of the District. Currently, the following benefits may be available to employees in this job classification.

Highlights
  • Medical Coverage (or $350/month if opted out)
  • Dental Coverage
  • Vision Insurance (Basic and Enhanced Plans Available)
  • Retirement Plan through the CA Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
    • 2% @ 55 (Classic Members)
    • 2% @ 62 (PEPRA Members)
    • 3% at 50 (Safety Members - Classic)
    • 2.7% @ 57 (Safety Members - PEPRA)
    • Reciprocity available for existing members of many other public retirement systems (see BART website and/or CalPERS website for details)
  • Money Purchase Pension Plan (in-lieu of participating in Social Security tax)
    • 6.65% employer contribution up to annual maximum of $1,868.65
  • Deferred Compensation & Roth 457
  • Sick Leave Accruals (12 days per year)
  • Vacation Accruals (3-6 weeks based on time worked w/ the District)
  • Holidays: 9 observed holidays and 5 floating holidays
  • Life Insurance w/ ability to obtain additional coverage
  • Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance
  • Survivor Benefits through BART
  • Short-Term Disability Insurance
  • Long-Term Disability Insurance
  • Flexible Spending Accounts: Health and Dependent Care
  • Commuter Benefits
  • Free BART Passes for BART employees and eligible family members.


Closing Date/Time: 7/31/2026 11:59 PM Pacific
BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

The BART story began in 1946. It began not by governmental fiat, but as a concept gradually evolving at informal gatherings of business and civic leaders on both sides of the San Francisco Bay. Facing a heavy post-war migration to the area and its consequent automobile boom, these people discussed ways of easing the mounting congestion that was clogging the bridges spanning the Bay. In 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connecting link between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent intolerable congestion on the Bay Bridge. The link? An underwater tube devoted exclusively to high-speed electric trains.

Since 1911, visionaries had periodically brought up this Jules Verne concept. But now, pressure for a traffic solution increased with the population. In 1951, the State Legislature created the 26-member San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Commission, comprised of representatives from each of the nine counties which touch the Bay. The Commission's charge was to study the Bay Area's long range transportation needs in the context of environmental problems and then recommend the best solution.

The Commission advised, in its final report in 1957, that any transportation plan must be coordinated with the area's total plan for future development. Since no development plan existed, the Commission prepared one itself. The result of their thoroughness is a master plan which did much to bring about coordinated planning in the Bay Area, and which was adopted a decade later by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

The BART Concept is Born
The Commission's least-cost solution to traffic tie-ups was to recommend forming a five-county rapid transit district, whose mandate would be to build and operate a high-speed rapid rail network linking major commercial centers with suburban sub-centers.

The Commission stated that, "If the Bay Area is to be preserved as a fine place to live and work, a regional rapid transit system is essential to prevent total dependence on automobiles and freeways."

Thus was born the environmental concept underlying BART. Acting on the Commission's recommendations, in 1957, the Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, comprising the five counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo. At this time, the District was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It also had authority to levy property taxes to support a general obligation bond issue, if approved by District voters. The State Legislature lowered the requirement for voter approval from 66 percent to 60 percent.

Between 1957 and 1962, engineering plans were developed for a system that would usher in a new era in rapid transit. Electric trains would run on grade-separated right-of-ways, reaching maximum speeds of 75-80 mph, averaging perhaps 45 mph, including station stops. Advanced transit cars, with sophisticated suspensions, braking and propulsion systems, and luxurious interiors, would be strong competition to "King Car " in the Bay Area. Stations would be pleasant, conveniently located, and striking architectural enhancements to their respective on-line communities.

BART employees in the 1970s

BART employees in the 1970s.

Hundreds of meetings were held in the District communities to encourage local citizen participation in the development of routes and station locations. By midsummer, 1961, the final plan was submitted to the supervisors of the five District counties for approval. San Mateo County Supervisors were cool to the plan. Citing the high costs of a new system-plus adequate existing service from Southern Pacific commuter trains - they voted to withdraw their county from the District in December 1961.

With the District-wide tax base thus weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County, Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost. Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

BART had started with a 16-member governing Board of Directors apportioned on county population size: four from Alameda and San Francisco Counties, three from Contra Costa and San Mateo, and two from Marin. When the District was reduced to three counties, the Board was reduced to 11 members: four from San Francisco and Alameda, and three from Contra Costa. Subsequently, in 1965, the District's enabling legislation was changed to apportion the BART Board with four Directors from each county, thus giving Contra Costa its fourth member on a 12-person Board. Two directors from each county, hence forth, were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. The other two directors were appointed by committees of mayors of each county (with the exception of the City and County of San Francisco, whose sole mayor made these appointments).

The five-county plan was quickly revised to a three-county plan emphasizing rapid transit between San Francisco and the East Bay cities and suburbs of Contra Costa and Alameda counties. The new plan, elaborately detailed and presented as the "BART Composite Report, " was approved by supervisors of the three counties in July 1962, and placed on the ballot for the following November general election.

The plan required approval of 60 percent of the District's voters. It narrowly passed with a 61.2 percent vote District-wide, much to the surprise of many political experts who were confident it would fail. Indeed, one influential executive was reported to have said: "If I'd known the damn thing would have passed, I'd never have supported it. "

The voters approved a $792 million bond issue to finance a 71.5 mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in the three counties. The proposal also included another needed transit project: rebuilding 3.5 miles of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. The new line would link muni streetcar lines directly with BART and Market Street stations, and four new Muni stations would be built.

The additional cost of the transbay tube -- estimated at $133 million -- was to come from bonds issued by the California Toll Bridge Authority and secured by future Bay Area Bridge revenues. The additional cost of rolling stock, estimated at $71 million, was to be funded primarily from bonds issued against future operating revenues. Thus, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.

After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.

 

Show more
Apply Now Employer Profile

MORE JOBS

Show More